Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41

Mike McGann on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 02:15:11 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41

To: "B Nomic - Business" <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41
From: "Mike McGann" <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:15:06 -0500
In-reply-to: <f51c80d20801141644x1724f06xe1c4595846d3f6b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <277041.36087.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141641t1d502337j92bfb430d16070a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f51c80d20801141644x1724f06xe1c4595846d3f6b9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 14, 2008 7:44 PM, Spencer Baugh <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> oops. Claim that to be Inconsistent, I accidentally didn't include the
> entire Oracularity. Or is it still included even though it's quoted?

Looks fine to me.

I claim this as Consistent.

- Hose
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

References:
- Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
  - From: Spencer Baugh

Prev by Date: Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by Date: Re: [s-b] Hammer of Thor
Previous by thread: Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
Next by thread: Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation -- Rule 41
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread