Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41

["Spencer Baugh" <dominovo@xxxxxxxxx>]

I answer this Yes.

Reasoning:
Rule 4E41 states there is no Rule 4E41. Therefore, we should remove it and
all references to it. This outcome could only be averted by there being no
rule 4E41, in which case the text which purports to be a rule should be
removed from the rulebook.

I submit the following Oracularity:
Remove all occurrences of the text between the quotation marks from the
Rules: "There is no Rule 4E41."
Repeal any Rule that has no text.


----- Original Message ----
> From: Mike McGann < mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: B Nomic - Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:47:37 PM
> Subject: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41
>
> [[ I really wanted this Rule to stay in because I get a laugh out if
> it, but if people insist... ]]
>
> I submit the following Consultation:
>
> {{
> Can we end the Rule 4E41 tomfoolery now?
>
> Unbeliever: 0x44
> }}
>
> I recommend the following Oracularity
> {{
> Remove all occurrences of the following text from the Rules:
> {{
> There is no Rule 4E41.
> }}
> Repeal any Rule that has no text.
> }}
> }}
>
> - Hose
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
Dominov
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business