Justin Ahmann on Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:05:23 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41 |
Going for a Paradox Win? The below Consultation is number 90. I assign it to Priest Dominov. Codae ----- Original Message ---- From: Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> To: B Nomic - Business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 5:47:37 PM Subject: [s-b] Consultation -- Rule 41 [[ I really wanted this Rule to stay in because I get a laugh out if it, but if people insist... ]] I submit the following Consultation: {{ Can we end the Rule 4E41 tomfoolery now? Unbeliever: 0x44 }} I recommend the following Oracularity {{ Remove all occurrences of the following text from the Rules: {{ There is no Rule 4E41. }} Repeal any Rule that has no text. }} }} - Hose _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business