Re: [s-b] [s-d] Assigning Consultation

["Aaron Coquet" <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx>]

I claim this to be CONSISTANT.

On Jan 10, 2008 2:25 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'm not sure the answer is consistent by i think the oracularity is a very
> neat fix indeed. I claim this to be consistent, but I'm the supplicant so
> who cares.
>
> BP
>
> On 1/10/08, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 10, 2008 1:40 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > > > On Jan 10, 2008 3:07 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> {
> > > >> Does any Player of B Nomic own a device named "Mutation Ray"?
> > > >>
> > > >> Reasoning: Proposal 280 ("Arabidopsis") created a non-unique device
> > (not a
> > > >> Blueprint...) called "Mutation Ray" yet did not assign this device
> an
> > owner.
> > > >> Rule 4E35 states that the range of the attribute "device owner" is
> > all
> > > >> devices, and that its scope is all device owning objects. The only
> > types of
> > > >> device owning objects mentioned in the rules are Players (again,
> > 4E35).
> > > >> }
> > > >>
> > > >> This is Consultation 70.  I assign it to Priest Wooble.
> > > >>
> > > > I answer this Consultation NO.
> > > >
> > > I claim this is CONSISTENT.
> > >
> > I also claim this to be CONSISTENT.
> >
> > BobTHJ
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-business mailing list
> > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
Aaron C
"H. P. Lovecraft is Rock and Roll" -- Neil Gaiman
Don't Panic!
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business