Re: [s-b] Assigning Consultation

["Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 10, 2008 1:40 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> > On Jan 10, 2008 3:07 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> {
> >> Does any Player of B Nomic own a device named "Mutation Ray"?
> >>
> >> Reasoning: Proposal 280 ("Arabidopsis") created a non-unique device (not a
> >> Blueprint...) called "Mutation Ray" yet did not assign this device an owner.
> >> Rule 4E35 states that the range of the attribute "device owner" is all
> >> devices, and that its scope is all device owning objects. The only types of
> >> device owning objects mentioned in the rules are Players (again, 4E35).
> >> }
> >>
> >> This is Consultation 70.  I assign it to Priest Wooble.
> >>
> > I answer this Consultation NO.
> >
> I claim this is CONSISTENT.
>
I also claim this to be CONSISTENT.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business