Josiah Worcester on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:10:37 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Grand Chancellor? |
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:10:44 Mike McGann wrote: > And, I'm going out for a beer unless that action is declared invalid. > > - Hose > > On Dec 11, 2007 10:09 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Dec 11, 2007 10:04 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > How could you possibly interpret 1-10 otherwise? > > > > > > > > I read it as: > > > > You have 1 nday to declare an action to be invalid. > > After 1 nday, the action is valid no matter what. > > > > I don't see where it takes 1 nday to be valid. If so, then nobody is the > > Minister of anything because all Ministries vacated at the end of the nweek, > > clock was off, and 1 nday could never elapse. > > > > - Hose > > > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > I declare your act of writing to the business forum invalid, unless Codae is not the Grand Chancellor. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business