Josiah Worcester on Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:10:37 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] [s-d] Grand Chancellor?


On Tuesday 11 December 2007 20:10:44 Mike McGann wrote:
> And, I'm going out for a beer unless that action is declared invalid.
> 
> - Hose
> 
> On Dec 11, 2007 10:09 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Dec 11, 2007 10:04 PM, comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > How could you possibly interpret 1-10 otherwise?
> > >
> > >
> > I read it as:
> >
> > You have 1 nday to declare an action to be invalid.
> > After 1 nday, the action is valid no matter what.
> >
> > I don't see where it takes 1 nday to be valid. If so, then nobody is the
> > Minister of anything because all Ministries vacated at the end of the 
nweek,
> > clock was off, and 1 nday could never elapse.
> >
> > - Hose
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> 

I declare your act of writing to the business forum invalid, unless Codae is 
not the Grand Chancellor.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business