0x44 on Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:37:59 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Voting + Some Game Actions |
I object to your usurpation of the Ministry of Questions. -- 0x44; Jamie Dallaire wrote: > The Oracle continues to defy me. > > I usurp the Ministry of Questions. > > Billy Pilgrim > > On Dec 9, 2007 11:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> On Dec 9, 2007 7:57 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> You are entirely correct about the Proposal Numbers, Oracle. I did mean >>> >> to >> >>> speak of Proposal 212. Your Proposal 202, however, was not included >>> >> because >> >>> its effects pale beside the might of Proposal 212, by which they are >>> engulfed mercilessly. >>> >>> That said, Oracle, I bid you to explain why you find my Consultations to >>> >> be >> >>> unworthy, and to explain how I may correct them to bring their worth to >>> >> an >> >>> acceptable level. >>> >> Partially because they were not phrased in the form of Questions. >> >> Of course, I'm happy to admit that it was mostly because I'm not >> afraid to abuse the power granted to me by the rules for the greater >> good of maintaining the integrity of the democratic process. It was >> clearly not the will of the voters that the game cease to be called "B >> Nomic" and if you can exploit one loophole in the Rules to try to >> subvert that will I'm happy to exploit other loopholes to see that >> it's not subverted. >> >> >>> Note that the Rules do not bind me to submitting a single Consultation >>> >> per >> >>> declaration of invalidity. >>> >>> Also note that unless you explain your ZOTTING satisfactorily, I shall >>> >> usurp >> >>> your position as Minister of Questions. No doubt all Players will agree >>> >> that >> >>> these Consultations must be seen through. >>> >> True, but I'd say if I can't muster a second Objection from somewhere >> then my intuition about the will of the Players is clearly wrong, and >> I'd then welcome an Oracularity declaring that the game shall >> henceforth no longer be called B Nomic and that we still have a >> Membership Test defined even if it's not used. >> >> -- >> Geoffrey Spear >> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ >> _______________________________________________ >> spoon-discuss mailing list >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss >> >> > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business