Geoffrey Spear on Sun, 9 Dec 2007 17:46:27 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Voting + Some Game Actions |
On Dec 9, 2007 7:27 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > { > "As Rulekeeper, I change the number of Rule 1-17 to 1-22" is valid. > > Unbeliever: Wooble > > Reasoning: I think Rule 1-8 is pretty clear... > } This is Consultation 71. > { "As Rulekeeper, I change the number of Rule 1-1 to 1-17" is valid. > > Unbeliever: Wooble > > Reasoning: No seriously, just read rule 1-8... :-p > } This is Consultation 72. > I humbly ask the Minister of Questions to assign these Consultations to > Priest Hose. Hose is the Player whose Repeal Proposal (Number 205) was > affected by these Actions. Actually, it's Proposals 202 and 212 that would be affected, both of which passed. 205 was your proposal and has nothing to do with either Rule 1-1 or 1-17. I not so humbly ZOT consultations 71 and 72 as I find them unworthy. --Oracle Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business