Josiah Worcester on Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:27:15 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Voting + Some Game Actions |
On Sunday 09 December 2007 21:17:59 Jamie Dallaire wrote: > The Oracle continues to defy me. > > I usurp the Ministry of Questions. > > Billy Pilgrim > > On Dec 9, 2007 11:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Dec 9, 2007 7:57 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > You are entirely correct about the Proposal Numbers, Oracle. I did mean > > to > > > speak of Proposal 212. Your Proposal 202, however, was not included > > because > > > its effects pale beside the might of Proposal 212, by which they are > > > engulfed mercilessly. > > > > > > That said, Oracle, I bid you to explain why you find my Consultations to > > be > > > unworthy, and to explain how I may correct them to bring their worth to > > an > > > acceptable level. > > > > Partially because they were not phrased in the form of Questions. > > > > Of course, I'm happy to admit that it was mostly because I'm not > > afraid to abuse the power granted to me by the rules for the greater > > good of maintaining the integrity of the democratic process. It was > > clearly not the will of the voters that the game cease to be called "B > > Nomic" and if you can exploit one loophole in the Rules to try to > > subvert that will I'm happy to exploit other loopholes to see that > > it's not subverted. > > > > > Note that the Rules do not bind me to submitting a single Consultation > > per > > > declaration of invalidity. > > > > > > Also note that unless you explain your ZOTTING satisfactorily, I shall > > usurp > > > your position as Minister of Questions. No doubt all Players will agree > > that > > > these Consultations must be seen through. > > > > True, but I'd say if I can't muster a second Objection from somewhere > > then my intuition about the will of the Players is clearly wrong, and > > I'd then welcome an Oracularity declaring that the game shall > > henceforth no longer be called B Nomic and that we still have a > > Membership Test defined even if it's not used. > > > > -- > > Geoffrey Spear > > http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > OBJECT. The AFO requests to become a player. The AFO OBJECTS. The AFO forfeits. _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business