Jamie Dallaire on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:16:04 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] [s-d] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint |
oh, sorry that wasnt in a new thread... On 11/26/07, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I guess this highlights the necessity for Hose's proposal to just do away > with the device rules for now. That said, thanks for the tip, Hose: > > I submit the following Proposal, entitled "Destroy that thing!" > > { > Any existing Blueprint named "How to scam the system" ceases to exist. > Any existing Device named "Staff of Winning" ceases to exist. > Any existing Blueprints or Devices created or defined after the start of > nday 8 of nweek 134 cease to exist. > } > > Billy Pilgrim > > > On 11/26/07, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Oops. Now I realized I shouldn't have said that. > > > > - Hose > > > > On Nov 26, 2007 1:09 PM, Mike McGann < mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Bidding ends on nday 11. It doesn't trigger until the next nday 6. > > > Somebody submit a proposal to destroy that thing! > > > > > > - Hose > > > > > > > > > On Nov 26, 2007 1:07 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Nov 26, 2007 1:01 PM, 0x44 < bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > I claim the Answer to Consultation Number 45 is CONSISTENT. > > > > > I bid m100 for the Staff of Winning. > > > > > > > > > > If someone will lend me m25, I will bid m125 for said Staff, > > thereby > > > > > preventing Wooble from being able to use the Staff should he > > attempt > > > > > outbid me. > > > > > > > > But I don't need to possess the staff for it to help me... It's > > > > triggered on nday 6 without any interaction by its owner and, oddly > > > > enough, would only benefit me. > > > > > > > > I say if you're going to point out a flaw in the system, you should > > > > exploit it in as egregious a way possible. I still think my ruling > > > > was consistent with the rules as they're currently (badly, IMO) > > > > written. > > > > -- > > > > Geoffrey Spear > > > > http://www.geoffreyspear.com/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > spoon-discuss mailing list > > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business