Mike McGann on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:52:49 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint |
I claim the Answer to Consultation Number 45 to be INCONSISTENT. I also bid m10 for the "Staff of Winning" - Hose On Nov 26, 2007 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Nov 25, 2007 11:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > A) > > > > > > {{ > > > Is it true that any player can define a blueprint? > > > }} > > > > > > This is Consultation Number 45 and I assign it to Priest Wooble. > > I answer YES. > > While the rules don't explicitly allow the creation of Blueprints > except by the Artisan, they don't forbid it, either. Everyone who > voted to foolishly repeal the Monopoly Rule may kick themselves. > > I create the following unique Blueprint "How to scam the system": > {{ > This blueprint can create the following unique device: > > Name: Staff of Winning > Trigger: nday 6 begins > Effect: All Players of Level 8 or above gain 260 points. Then, the > Staff is destroyed. > }} > > I bid 1m for the "How to scam the system" blueprint. > > --Wooble > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ spoon-business mailing list spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business