Mike McGann on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:52:49 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint


I claim the Answer to Consultation Number 45 to be INCONSISTENT.

I also bid m10 for the "Staff of Winning"

- Hose

On Nov 26, 2007 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2007 11:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > A)
> > >
> > > {{
> > > Is it true that any player can define a blueprint?
> > > }}
> >
> >
> > This is Consultation Number 45 and I assign it to Priest Wooble.
>
> I answer YES.
>
> While the rules don't explicitly allow the creation of Blueprints
> except by the Artisan, they don't forbid it, either.  Everyone who
> voted to foolishly repeal the Monopoly Rule may kick themselves.
>
> I create the following unique Blueprint "How to scam the system":
> {{
> This blueprint can create the following unique device:
>
> Name: Staff of Winning
> Trigger: nday 6 begins
> Effect: All Players of Level 8 or above gain 260 points.  Then, the
> Staff is destroyed.
> }}
>
> I bid 1m for the "How to scam the system" blueprint.
>
> --Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business