Re: [s-b] Consultation 45 Answer; Blueprint

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I claim the Answer to Consultation Number 45 is CONSISTENT.
I bid m100 for the Staff of Winning.

If someone will lend me m25, I will bid m125 for said Staff, thereby
preventing Wooble from being able to use the Staff should he attempt
outbid me.

Mike McGann wrote:
> I claim the Answer to Consultation Number 45 to be INCONSISTENT.
>
> I also bid m10 for the "Staff of Winning"
>
> - Hose
>
> On Nov 26, 2007 10:04 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> On Nov 25, 2007 11:08 AM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>     
>>>> A)
>>>>
>>>> {{
>>>> Is it true that any player can define a blueprint?
>>>> }}
>>>>         
>>> This is Consultation Number 45 and I assign it to Priest Wooble.
>>>       
>> I answer YES.
>>
>> While the rules don't explicitly allow the creation of Blueprints
>> except by the Artisan, they don't forbid it, either.  Everyone who
>> voted to foolishly repeal the Monopoly Rule may kick themselves.
>>
>> I create the following unique Blueprint "How to scam the system":
>> {{
>> This blueprint can create the following unique device:
>>
>> Name: Staff of Winning
>> Trigger: nday 6 begins
>> Effect: All Players of Level 8 or above gain 260 points.  Then, the
>> Staff is destroyed.
>> }}
>>
>> I bid 1m for the "How to scam the system" blueprint.
>>
>> --Wooble
>> _______________________________________________
>> spoon-business mailing list
>> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business