| William P. Berard on Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:30:11 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| [s-b] Consultation : Factions being players |
I submit the following consultation :
{
Can a game Object be both a Player and a Faction?
}
Reasoning :
A Faction, as defined by Rule 5-2, is an Agreement. An Agreement
(capital A), as defined by rule 5-1, is an agreement (lower case a)
between parties, parties being External Forces. By its definition, an
Agreement, is a game Object that binds External Forces together, it is
not,in itself, an External Force. As such, an Agreement cannot be a
Player, as a Player is an Outsider, that is, both an Object within the
game and an External Force outside the game. Since 5-3 does not state
that Agreements get an External Force status if they qualify as a
Faction, then I think that Factions cannot be players, as they are not
External Forces.
Moreover, Rule 1-3 defines an External Force as "anything which exists
independently of the game. That is, it would still exist if the game
stopped existing, and would still exist if the game had never started
existing.". Although the Agreement defining a Faction could exist
outside of the game, A Faction needs to be an Agreement recognized by
the game to be a Faction, and the very concept of Faction is something
that is recognized, or not, in the game. As such, were, the game cease
to exist, any Faction would cease to exist, as they are defined within
the game. Here again, this disqualifies Factions for the status of
External Force, and, as such, Factions can not be players.
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business