Re: [s-b] consultation 17

[bd_ <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:54:33AM -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
> To the public forum:
> 
> On 6/21/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 6/21/07, Antonio <antonio.dolcetta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > if this message is duplicated please ignore it
> > >
> > > I submit the following consultation:
> > > {
> > > Supposing there are two
> > > Players, say A and B, where A is a single human being and B is a group
> > > of human beings that contains A, then if A and B vote for the same
> > > proposal only the most recent vote is counted. True or false ?
> > > }
> > > Reasoning:
> > > {
> > > B nomic has traditionally enforced the idea "one man, one vote"
> > > If
> > > a Primo style corporation were allowed to become a player any entity
> > > who is a player by itself and is also part of the corporation would
> > > have a number of votes >1
> > > Bear with me here:
> > > rule 2-2 states:
> > > - Any Player may submit a Vote on an Open proposal at any time. ...
> > > - The most recent Vote on a proposal by a Player is called that
> > > - player's Final Vote on that proposal
> > > the intent clearly being to allow only one vote from each player.
> > > by Rule 1-4
> > > - A Player is an Outsider
> > > and by Rule 1-3
> > > - An Outsider is an External Force
> > > So going back to the consultation's example Player A who is part of B is actually resubmitting his Final vote through B.
> > > }
> > >
> > > This is Consultation 17, assigned to BobTHJ
> > >
> > I have attempted to distance myself from Primo Corp while pondering
> > this ruling, so as to deliver an impartial judgment. However, based
> > upon the evidence at hand, I rule FALSE.

I claim this ruling is CONSISTENT.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business