J.J. Young on Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:24:46 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle


I agree with you, Mike.  Maybe my wording wasn't clear.  I was trying to say
that a Combined land phase counted all as one phase for purposes of a combat
disqualifying a force from reinforcing.

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle


> At 09:14 AM 9/10/2006, you wrote:
> > > reinforce.  Then, after all field combats are concluded, sieges are
> > > conducted (and the non-phasing player may or may not announce a
"garrison
> > > attacks" combat, as he sees fit).
> >
> >I'm not sure what you mean here.  Shouldn't a "garrison attacks" combat
only
> >happen when the phasing player controls the garrison ?  You can't
initiate a
> >siege combat in either direction unless it is your land phase, correct ?
> >
> >Also, keep in mind that combats only disqualify forces from reinforcing
if
> >the combats are taking or going to take place in the same power's land
turn
> >as the battle to be reinforced.  Combats that happen during other
players'
> >(or Combined players') turns, even in the same month, do not disqualify
you
> >from reinforcing.
>
> There is only one combat turn for a combined movement force so it would
> never be possible for a combined set of players to fight a battle and
> reinforce another battle by another member of the combined force.
Combined
> players don't have separate turns.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia