J.J. Young on Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:24:46 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle |
I agree with you, Mike. Maybe my wording wasn't clear. I was trying to say that a Combined land phase counted all as one phase for purposes of a combat disqualifying a force from reinforcing. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 1:08 PM Subject: Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle > At 09:14 AM 9/10/2006, you wrote: > > > reinforce. Then, after all field combats are concluded, sieges are > > > conducted (and the non-phasing player may or may not announce a "garrison > > > attacks" combat, as he sees fit). > > > >I'm not sure what you mean here. Shouldn't a "garrison attacks" combat only > >happen when the phasing player controls the garrison ? You can't initiate a > >siege combat in either direction unless it is your land phase, correct ? > > > >Also, keep in mind that combats only disqualify forces from reinforcing if > >the combats are taking or going to take place in the same power's land turn > >as the battle to be reinforced. Combats that happen during other players' > >(or Combined players') turns, even in the same month, do not disqualify you > >from reinforcing. > > There is only one combat turn for a combined movement force so it would > never be possible for a combined set of players to fight a battle and > reinforce another battle by another member of the combined force. Combined > players don't have separate turns. > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia