Kyle H on Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:20:33 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle |
Quite correct, sorry. I should have written "phasing" instead of "non-phasing" in the section JJ quoted below. For the record, I agree with Mike that Combined Movers "phase" together. (So you can't count some of them as "phasing" and others as "non-phasing".) kdh ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 10:14 AM Subject: Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle >> reinforce. Then, after all field combats are concluded, sieges are >> conducted (and the non-phasing player may or may not announce a "garrison >> attacks" combat, as he sees fit). > > I'm not sure what you mean here. Shouldn't a "garrison attacks" combat > only > happen when the phasing player controls the garrison ? You can't initiate > a > siege combat in either direction unless it is your land phase, correct ? > > Also, keep in mind that combats only disqualify forces from reinforcing if > the combats are taking or going to take place in the same power's land > turn > as the battle to be reinforced. Combats that happen during other players' > (or Combined players') turns, even in the same month, do not disqualify > you > from reinforcing. > > -JJY > > -JJY > > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia