Kyle H on Sun, 10 Sep 2006 10:20:33 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle

    Quite correct, sorry.  I should have written "phasing" instead of 
"non-phasing" in the section JJ quoted below.
    For the record, I agree with Mike that Combined Movers "phase" together. 
(So you can't count some of them as "phasing" and others as "non-phasing".)


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] question about reinforcing a battle

>> reinforce.  Then, after all field combats are concluded, sieges are
>> conducted (and the non-phasing player may or may not announce a "garrison
>> attacks" combat, as he sees fit).
> I'm not sure what you mean here.  Shouldn't a "garrison attacks" combat 
> only
> happen when the phasing player controls the garrison ?  You can't initiate 
> a
> siege combat in either direction unless it is your land phase, correct ?
> Also, keep in mind that combats only disqualify forces from reinforcing if
> the combats are taking or going to take place in the same power's land 
> turn
> as the battle to be reinforced.  Combats that happen during other players'
> (or Combined players') turns, even in the same month, do not disqualify 
> you
> from reinforcing.
> -JJY
> -JJY
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx

eia mailing list