Michael Gorman on Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:55:02 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Battle of Leopoldstadt resolution |
At 11:42 AM 8/28/2006, you wrote: >I like solution #2 best. This seems similar to the FORCED WAR DECLARATIONS >rules (4.6.4.2) for attacking a neutral minor. > >I agree that a MP cannot fight a MP they are not at war with (w/ the naval >exception that Joel pointed out). I think each side should decide via >escrow whether to attempt to reinforce or not. After that, if both decide >to reinforce and both do so successfully then they do so with the knowledge >that they each *must* declare war on the other per 4.6.4.2 This states that >"If two or more MPs do not back down ...each *must* declare war on all MPs >also attacking... (unless already at war with them)". > >As a benefit, 4.6.4.2.1 states that this "costs the same as declaring war on >*one* MP". How will this interact with enforced peace? _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia