James Helle on Mon, 28 Aug 2006 09:42:03 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Battle of Leopoldstadt resolution |
I like solution #2 best. This seems similar to the FORCED WAR DECLARATIONS rules (4.6.4.2) for attacking a neutral minor. I agree that a MP cannot fight a MP they are not at war with (w/ the naval exception that Joel pointed out). I think each side should decide via escrow whether to attempt to reinforce or not. After that, if both decide to reinforce and both do so successfully then they do so with the knowledge that they each *must* declare war on the other per 4.6.4.2 This states that "If two or more MPs do not back down ...each *must* declare war on all MPs also attacking... (unless already at war with them)". As a benefit, 4.6.4.2.1 states that this "costs the same as declaring war on *one* MP". -----Original Message----- From: eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:eia-bounces@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kyle H Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:36 AM To: public list for an Empires in Arms game Subject: Re: [eia] Battle of Leopoldstadt resolution Oh. OK. I see the problem now. I say let both sides roll to reinforce. If only one side is successful, then there's no problem. If both sides succeed, then there are 2 ways we could go. Solution 1: If both sides successfully reinforce, then we could just stipulate that neither reinforcement was successful. They "bounce" off each other and are reset to their areas of origin. (This follows Jim's suggestion.) Solution 2: If both sides successfully reinforce, then the power(s) that are not at war would have an opportunity to declare war immediately, just as in 7.3.8.3. If a power that has reinforced does not choose to declare war and is not at war with all of the nations in the opposing stack (after reinforcement), then it must return to its original land area. I prefer solution 2, as it uses already existing rules in a different context. kdh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx> To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 9:11 AM Subject: Re: [eia] Battle of Leopoldstadt resolution > Thus spake "Kyle H": >> I think decisions whether or not to reinforce should be made >> simultaneously (i.e. via escrow). Therefore, rolls to reinforce ought >> also >> to be simultaneous. >> >> kdh > > I agree, but what happens in my hypothetical situtation, then? > > -- > J. > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia