Re: [eia] optional rules, interpretations

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am cautiously willing to try the limited access rules.

I was never in favor of interpreting the PP rules for battles differently
than as written, anyway, so I agree with Joel.

I am still opposed to 12.3.9.

I have a question regarding overwhelming numbers; what if neither side (or
just one side) does not know for certain the strength of the other ?

-JJY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel Uckelman" <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 3:14 PM
Subject: [eia] optional rules, interpretations


> As for optional rules, we've been using everything here:
>
>   http://eia.xnetz.com/rules/eiarules-with-errata.html
>
> except 12.3.9 (ceding only through a peace), 12.4 (limited access after a
> peace), and 12.3.10 (overwhelming numbers).
>
> I'm still opposed to 12.3.9, but am in favor of 12.4 and 12.3.10.
>
> Also, I'd like to once again raise the issue of PP awards for battles
> involving more than one power on a side. I still think that the awards
> are supposed to work as described in #1 under "Ten Tactical Tips" here:
>
> http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=ah/article/ah20030801a
>
> as opposed to the way we've been doing it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia