Michael Gorman on Wed, 27 Jul 2005 14:24:45 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] optional rules, interpretations


At 02:14 PM 7/27/2005, you wrote:
As for optional rules, we've been using everything here:

  http://eia.xnetz.com/rules/eiarules-with-errata.html

except 12.3.9 (ceding only through a peace), 12.4 (limited access after a
peace), and 12.3.10 (overwhelming numbers).

I'm still opposed to 12.3.9, but am in favor of 12.4 and 12.3.10.

Also, I'd like to once again raise the issue of PP awards for battles
involving more than one power on a side. I still think that the awards
are supposed to work as described in #1 under "Ten Tactical Tips" here:

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=ah/article/ah20030801a

as opposed to the way we've been doing it.

I'm fine with this.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia