Nate Ellefson on Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:16:27 -0500 (CDT)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: [eia] Russian Land Phase, December 1805


> Thus spake "Nate Ellefson":
> > 
> > I would disagree with this line.  I think that Spain should only be 
> > able to take part in the battle if they have combined movement with 
> > Russia, which they don't.  Combined movement is what accounts for 
> > coordination among countries, and that if combined movement isn't 
> > there, neither is the coordination that is required for two 
> countries 
> > to fight as a single force.  In my opinion, in this case, if the 
> > Spanish garrison wants to fight, they'll have to try to break out 
> > independently of Russian action.
> >
> 
> There is a clear example in which combined movement is not 
> needed to fight: 
> reinforcement during a battle. Belligerent corps adjacent to 
> an area where 
> there's a battle can try to reinforce, regardless of whose 
> land phase it is.

Good citing of a similar case. I agree Spain should be able to fight
with Russia in this case.

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia