Nate Ellefson on Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:16:27 -0500 (CDT) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
RE: [eia] Russian Land Phase, December 1805 |
> Thus spake "Nate Ellefson": > > > > I would disagree with this line. I think that Spain should only be > > able to take part in the battle if they have combined movement with > > Russia, which they don't. Combined movement is what accounts for > > coordination among countries, and that if combined movement isn't > > there, neither is the coordination that is required for two > countries > > to fight as a single force. In my opinion, in this case, if the > > Spanish garrison wants to fight, they'll have to try to break out > > independently of Russian action. > > > > There is a clear example in which combined movement is not > needed to fight: > reinforcement during a battle. Belligerent corps adjacent to > an area where > there's a battle can try to reinforce, regardless of whose > land phase it is. Good citing of a similar case. I agree Spain should be able to fight with Russia in this case. _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia