Re: [eia] French Economic Phase- Mar. 05

["J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

One other small thing, Jim, is that the loser of a siege battle does not
lose a PP; the victor gains one and that's it.  Other than that and the +2
PP for Sweden thing, your list looks complete to me.  So France ends up with
a net gain of 1 PP, ending in the lowest "10" box.

-JJY

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "public list for an Empires in Arms game" <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2004 12:47 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] French Economic Phase- Mar. 05


> At 10:34 PM 5/21/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> >You are correct, JJ.  Adding Corsica and Palatinate brings the conquered
> >minors to $57/ 23MP.  Here are the political adjustments I have:
> >     -5  DoW on minors
> >     +5 conquer the above minors
> >     +2 gain control of Mecklinburg & Duchies
> >     -2 lose control of Mecklinburg & Duchies
> >     -1 lose naval battle at Lorient
> >     -1 scuttle Holland fleet
> >     +1 gain control of Sweden
> >     -1 lose Swedish naval battle
> >     +2 win naval battle & pursuit at St. Malo
> >     -1 lose siege at LeHavre
> >This results in a net loss of 1 PP, placing me in the lowest "9" box
before
> >adjusting for drift..  (In listing these, I noticed I deducted the naval
> >loss at Lorient twice!)  I have searched the archives, but have not found
> >what I am missing.
>
> Sweden has two districts so I believe you get 2 points for taking control
> of it.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>
>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia