Re: [eia] Jumping the Gun

["Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

'Sall good.   It seems that Prussia has no intention of changing their
orders anyway.



On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 20:00:46 -0500
"Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > > As there were errors with those land orders, we
> > > allowed those to be corrected.  If you look carefully at the Combined
> > > Movement Sequence outlined in 7.3.8, each major power takes their move
> in
> > > turn.  GB took its move, then Prussia took its move (as amended), and
> now
> > > Austria still has to take its move.
> >
> > Thanks for pointing that out and making my point for me. According to
> > 7.3.8.1, the allies must decide who with combined movement will move
> > first.  I was not allowed
> > this as Prussia went before the war of E. Milan had even started.
> >
> 
>     That seems like miscommunication among the Coalition partners.  I don't
> see how it concerns me.  You are to decide amongst yourselves who will go
> first.  When land orders appear from GB and from Prussia, that sure seems
> like that is the order that you wished to move in.  How are the rest of us
> supposed to know that someone is acting out of turn unless someone says so?
> A simple email from you saying Prussia's land phase is invalid because he
> is going out of order (or because no order has been legally established)
> would have helped.
>     (Apparently we also need to establish means for determining that the
> order of movement has been legally determined.  I suppose an escrow will do.
> You could send it out to all the Coalition partners, and they could send
> responses when they are satisfied that the movement order has been
> established.)
> 
> >
> > How is France being punished?
> >
> 
>     In the intervening days when I thought I was only waiting for Austria's
> land orders, I have made agreements with 2 players the details of which I am
> not at liberty to reveal.
> 
>     You guys do what you want.  But I don't want you guys to forget that on
> two occasions I requested to go back and change things that would have had
> no effect on what had happened since, and both times my request was
> rejected.  If you feel like you need to go back and change things to make
> things work out for you, that's great.  Go ahead.  But don't pretend that
> the rules are being applied the same to everyone.
> 
> kdh
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia