Michael Gorman on 3 Dec 2002 18:03:03 -0000


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [eia] Siege of Silistra, May 1805 

At 04:30 PM 12/3/2002 +0000, you wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Dice rolls requested by: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
Rolls also sent to:
    eia@xxxxxxxxx

# Turkish siege roll, breach on 4+, sortie on 1
# Turkish assault rolls, 5-1
# Russian assault rolls, 5-2

No. of sides on every die:      6
No. of dice for every roll:     1
No. of dice rolls requested:    7
No. of rolls per line:          1

      6
      3
      2
      5
      5
      6
      1
With 9 attacking factors this should see the end of that one point garrison, so Silistra falls. Net political point changes for Russian and Turkish phases should see Russia unchanged (-1 point in naval phase and +1 point in land) and Turkey up 1 (+1 Naval, -1 Russian Land, +1 Turkish Land since Silistra was fortified)
In the future the attack rolls should not accompany the breach rolls as that garrison would have surrendered rather than fought since I already know the strength of the attacking corps and that my defenders could not win or inflict losses. 

Mike


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia