Re: [eia] Siege of Silistra, May 1805

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    I think I may have fallen off the EIA email list somehow.  I did not
receive the dice results that are referred to in Mike's email below.  Nor
did I ever receive copies of the emails I sent to the list earlier this
afternoon.  (I guess I haven't fallen completely off the list, though, since
I did get the email below.)

Help!

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] Siege of Silistra, May 1805


> At 04:30 PM 12/3/2002 +0000, you wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >
> >
> >Dice rolls requested by: Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Rolls also sent to:
> >     eia@xxxxxxxxx
> >
> ># Turkish siege roll, breach on 4+, sortie on 1
> ># Turkish assault rolls, 5-1
> ># Russian assault rolls, 5-2
> >
> >No. of sides on every die:      6
> >No. of dice for every roll:     1
> >No. of dice rolls requested:    7
> >No. of rolls per line:          1
> >
> >       6
> >       3
> >       2
> >       5
> >       5
> >       6
> >       1
> With 9 attacking factors this should see the end of that one point
> garrison, so Silistra falls.
> Net political point changes for Russian and Turkish phases should see
> Russia unchanged (-1 point in naval phase and +1 point in land) and Turkey
> up 1 (+1 Naval, -1 Russian Land, +1 Turkish Land since Silistra was
fortified)
>
> In the future the attack rolls should not accompany the breach rolls as
> that garrison would have surrendered rather than fought since I already
> know the strength of the attacking corps and that my defenders could not
> win or inflict losses.
>
> Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia