Re: [eia] Siege of Silistra, May 1805

[Joel Uckelman <uckelman@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thus spake Michael Gorman:
>
> With 9 attacking factors this should see the end of that one point 
> garrison, so Silistra falls.
> Net political point changes for Russian and Turkish phases should see 
> Russia unchanged (-1 point in naval phase and +1 point in land) and Turkey 
> up 1 (+1 Naval, -1 Russian Land, +1 Turkish Land since Silistra was fortified
> )
> 
> In the future the attack rolls should not accompany the breach rolls as 
> that garrison would have surrendered rather than fought since I already 
> know the strength of the attacking corps and that my defenders could not 
> win or inflict losses.
> 
> Mike

I thought of that right after sending the rolls, my mistake. If you want to 
surrender that factor instead, that's ok. It seems to be the rational thing 
to do, given the high probability that it would both die and cost you a 
political point.

-- 
J.


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia