J.J. Young on 3 Dec 2002 21:09:02 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Siege of Silistra, May 1805 |
> Net political point changes for Russian and Turkish phases should see > Russia unchanged (-1 point in naval phase and +1 point in land) and Turkey > up 1 (+1 Naval, -1 Russian Land, +1 Turkish Land since Silistra was fortified) I'm a little lost as to exactly where the Russian and Turkish political status should be. I could look it up, but does anyone know for sure ? > In the future the attack rolls should not accompany the breach rolls as > that garrison would have surrendered rather than fought since I already > know the strength of the attacking corps and that my defenders could not > win or inflict losses. I agree, and I wouldn't have a problem with Russia saying retroactively that the garrison did indeed surrender. -JJY _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia