Re: [eia] Games are supposed to be fun

["Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Although Kyle's plan has the simplicity of looking at the map and knowing whether or not there is a siege, I do have a slight preference for Mike's plan, which I think more closely conforms to the rules as written, but with the following caveats:

I am strongly in favor of Mike's plan.

> 1.)  A defender in a city should be able to build a sea supply depot there whether the attacker outside is laying siege or not.

I'm not really committed to this either way.  (Sea supply?  Us Austrians get
sea sick)

> 2.)  All or none of the attacking corps that end up surrounding a city must lay siege to that city.

I am strongly in favor of this.

-Everett

-- 
Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia