Re: [eia] 3/05 Austria land phase

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Hold it.  I thought we had just finished a conversation in which we all
agreed that the spirit of our House Rules was violated by requiring
retirement decisions in the middle of another player's land phase.  Now
maybe JJ's and Everett's emails indicate that they wish to revisit that
decision.  So be it.  But here are the rules I thought we had just agreed
to:

When a player is moving during their land phase:
    -they must stop whenever they enter a space containing an enemy corps
(contrary to the written rules).
    -they must make decisions during supply about whether to use unused
movement points for forage or not, and the decision would impact eligibility
for laying siege (contrary to the written rules).
    -all retirement decisions by non-phasing players are made after the
phasing player's land orders are complete (contrary to the written rules).

There are two possibilities:  either I completely misunderstood the point of
our recent discussions, or some of you have changed your minds about this
issue.  Please let me know which one it is (or if there is a third
alternative I am missing).

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [eia] 3/05 Austria land phase


> 7.3.7.1 seems clear that the defender should decide whether or not to
retire
> into the city before the attacker decides whether or not to modify their
> foraging roll with unused movement points.  So I believe France would have
> to decide about Davout's corps, then Austria would choose whether to
forage
> at 4-, forage at 5-, or pay for supply (Everett and Kyle would have to
work
> out what is fair as far as the forage roll already made sticking or being
> rerolled).
>
> I'm not sure how to handle this in the future, to avoid backtracking.  Any
> ideas ?
>
> -JJY
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 11:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [eia] 3/05 Austria land phase
>
>
> > Which comes first, my decision to forage, or your decision to retreat
> > into the city?
> >
> >
> > >     Ok, here we have a situation where 4 corps are headed to Turin,
and
> only
> > > one of them used unused movement for a forage roll.  I suppose that
> means
> > > that only that corps would be ineligible to participate in a siege?
Or
> does
> > > it mean that all of them would be ineligible to participate in a
siege?
> > > Just wondering...
> > >
> > > kdh
> > >
> > > > C corp in Venice w/ Charles => Mantua => W => Milan => Turin (F/5-)
> > > > C corp in Venice => Mantua => W => Milan => Turin ($2)
> > > > I corp in Bologna picks up garrison => NW => Milan, drops 1 garrison
> =>
> > > > Turin  ($2)
> > > > I corp in Mantua => W => Milan => Turin ($2)
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> > --
> > Everett E. Proctor <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
>

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia