Re: [eia] Control of Papacy revisited

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Excellent observation.  We'll definitely be more careful in future.

kdh

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Everett E. Proctor" <spiritmast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Control of Papacy revisited


> Re-reading the rules,
> 
> 4.6  "the major power chosen must not be at war with that neutral minor
> country and may only be an ally of a major power at war with it if there
> are no non-allies willing or eligible to run it"
> 
> Therefore, I think we erred and the control of the Papacy should have
> gone to Turkey.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> 

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia