J.J. Young on 8 Jul 2002 10:06:04 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] France's land phase orders |
> Since a city garrison can choose to fight rather than accepting a > siege, about the only time it would matter that only 10 factors can be > assigned to a depot is if you want to drop a really big garrison someplace. > I think I did screw up that only ten garrison factors could choose > to remain outside of the city. The city garrison does not have to retire, > so you could retire corps into the city and leave a larger number of > garrison factors outside the city than the depot garrison of 10 factors. I > suspect that would normally be a poor choice as garrison factors don't > retreat and typically have lousy leader values so you'd usually want your > corps outside where they could withdraw or whatever and survive, but you > could fight with the garrison factors instead of the corps if you wanted > to. I could see Turkey doing it as their garrison factors have a point > more moral than most of their corps factors. If you read 7.5.1.2, it says that city garrisons may _not_ be used in a field combat in the city's area, only depot garrisons (along with corps and other mobile forces) can be so used. The only exception to this is a limited field combat, where an attack is made to relieve a city garrison under seige. In this case, some or all of the city garrison can participate (see 7.5.4.2.3); I think this (i.e., the limited mobility of garrisons) is the reason that limited field combats can only last one day. -JJY _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia