[s-d] Re: Color choice

[pete+bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Cooper Jr.)]

Daniel Lepage <dpl33@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Executive Tidiness exists to let us repair errors, whether they're
> made by normal players or by Ministers. I see no difference between
> adding the text that should have been put in nweeks ago, and, for
> example, adding the missing W to 'aterspouts' some time after the rule
> was created. Would you claim that if enough time had elapsed, the
> Statute of Limitations would force the rule to talk about "aterspouts"?

No, and that's a good point. I guess that I'm just pointing out that
there may be a difference between fixing a typo and adding all of a
Body to a Card.

When I first read Executive Tidiness, I was thinking that it was
mainly for fixing typos, but I guess that its use here is more
inclined to allowing any kind of quick change as long as there is
unanimous consent.

And since there is little to be gained by not allowing the bodies to
be added to the cards, I (and most others, presumably) won't object.

-- 
Peter C.
"Timeline? This is no time to talk about time. We don't have the time!"
		-- Troi, Star Trek: First Contact

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss