David E. Smith on 8 May 2001 05:33:59 -0000

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spoon-discuss: Joel's Move

On Tue, 8 May 2001, David E. Smith wrote:

[ Yes, I'm replying to myself. Weird, ain't it? ]

> The whole issue of a potentially absent Administrator is one that, from my
> quick survey of the rules, doesn't seem to be addressed. This practically
> begs for a rule of some sort, but I'm not sure what would be fair. Yeah,
> if e resigns, that's covered; but what if e is in fact hit by a bus? We
> should also possibly cover the possibility of a vote of no-confidence.

Which, upon further review of the rules, seems to be pretty much taken
care of.

Rule 208/1 specifies that the Administrator is an elected officer, and
Rule 315/2 covers motions of no-confidence. Wheee!