Re: [Spoon-business] CFI 1748

[Mark Karasek <mkarasek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I concur with Glotmorf's analysis that r1248 (Speed Limit) caused the 
plaintiff's score to be set to either 42 or 542. However, it is impossible 
to determine which value it was set to; thus it was undefined and by r154, 
Section A, it was subsequently set to zero. This caused the Speed Limit to 
take effect, setting the plaintiff's score to 42 or 542, causing it to 
become undefined and thererfore zero and causing the Speed Limit to take 
effect again (and again (and again...)).

In summary, at the time that the CFI was issued the plaintiff's score was 
continuously changing between undefined and zero, and continued to do so 
until the end of the nweek, at which time it became (and stayed at) zero.

My judgement on this CFI is Refused, as the plaintiff's score was in an 
indeterminate state; the actual value is moot, as it eventually became 
zero.

--The Pusher Robot
_______________________________________________
spoon-business mailing list
spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business