Re: [s-d] [s-b] emergency?

[Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

Huh, I see that that one does not actually require Admin recognition
(unlike most game actions), so you're right, it seems to have worked
iff there was, in fact, an emergency.

...hm, but that also means a bunch of emergency proposals did things
that were never previously believed to have worked. I'm gonna have to
hunt through the archives and try to come up with a competing
hypothesis about the gamestate.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If that's the ruleset, your scam failed because the proposal was
>> submitted by somebody other than a player or the administrator. (I
>> accept the logic of the scam, it's just missing a step.)
>
> I have posted a message to the public forum explicitly stating my wish
> to become a player more recently than I last forfeited the game. Rules
> 13 and 26 don't actually make being listed on the Roster a necessary
> condition of playerhood.
> --
> Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss