Re: [s-d] [s-b] emergency?

[Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>]

If that's the ruleset, your scam failed because the proposal was
submitted by somebody other than a player or the administrator. (I
accept the logic of the scam, it's just missing a step.)

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If that's the ruleset, the most recently recognized set of players is
>> the set from the Admin's last Recognizer prior to the cessation of
>> actual gameplay. Your recognition of an emergency matters only if you
>> are on that list.
>>
>> I say we track them all down and ask them to do us the favor of
>> recognizing an Emergency. I bet I can get a majority of them, should
>> you be able to point me at a date to look for recognition of player
>> status.
>
> If my scam worked, then it formally recognized a Player list that
> included me. If it didn't, the game's not unstuck anyway.
> --
> Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss