Re: [s-d] [s-b] This game is boring, let's have an Emergency.

[Gabriel Vistica <gvistica@xxxxxxxxx>]

Okay, I'm getting REALLY confused here. Can somebody give a simple version of 
what the game state currently is?

Also, I'm going to let the various reports sit for a few days so the Clock will 
stay off and we (I) can concentrate on this.



----- Original Message ----
> From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: spoon-business <spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thu, December 23, 2010 1:36:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [s-b] [s-d]  This game is boring, let's have an Emergency.
> 
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> > On 23 December 2010 20:54, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> One,  pragmatism.
> >
> > THIS IS B.
> >
> > EVERYTHING MUST BE TAKEN  EXTREMELY LITERALLY AND PLATONICALLY.
> >
> > IF WHAT YOU'RE REASONING  BREAKS THE GAME, YOU'RE DOING IT CORRECTLY,
> > KEEP UP THE GOOD  WORK.
> 
> Oddly, B was founded as a very pragmatic game. In fact, I'd say  under
> game custom as it was at the end of era one, era two works just  fine.
> But in case we want to replatonize ourselves into that (and frankly  I
> *like* platonic play):
> 
> I offer an alliance to Wooble. Then I  recognize an  emergency.
> 
> http://web.archive.org/web/20041205140215/www.bnomic.org/static/rules.html
> is  the most recent ruleset I can find, and I believe the absence of
> *all of the  ministers* is an emergency; under these rules, "I
> recognize an emergency" is  the preferred way of doing this.
> 
> Things to know about these  rules:
> 
> 1. There is a card game. It involves the following  cards:
> http://web.archive.org/web/20041205131207/www.bnomic.org/display_all_cards.psp
> 
> 2.  There is a subgame called Political Go, or PGo for short. I
> remember playing  this one; it's good times.
> 
> 3. There's also a board, and stuff happens on  it in accordance with
> the Book of Piece. I can't find a copy of that, so  we'll have to write
> a new one.
> 
> 4. Game custom is that multiple  comments within a rule don't trigger
> the dreaded comment bug. (The relevant  text: "Excepting any text in
> this Rule prior to and including this sentence,  any text appearing
> within doubled square brackets ("[[" and "]]") shall be  considered
> "comment" text. Comment text shall not have the force of Rule;  its
> purpose is solely elucidative or demonstrative.") This is  important,
> since every single rule ends with a comment.
> 
> 5. All  Societies have been destroyed for lack of members.
> 
> In case of other ways  things could conceivably be:
> 
> I begin recognizing a state of emergency. I  push my panic button. He
> is pushing his panic button. I become Paranoid. I  intend to initiate
> an  emergency.
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business  mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
> 


      
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss