| Jeff Gitchel on Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:21:19 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Let's see what this does... |
If a player insists on not having a name (though I don't think you can become un-named once you are a player) then they would not be a player. Rule 26 states that the Roster lists ALL players and includes their names. Those without names cannot be listed and do not fall into the set of All Players. -- Jeff Gitchel jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://turtlemoon.org twitter: gitchel On 1/07/2010, at 16:10, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Jeff Gitchel <gitchel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Hmm. My suspicion is that you become not a player once you have no name. So, once you changed it to Respected One, no other >> actions took place. > > A player is required to have a name; not having one is a violation of > Rule 2. However, Rule 2 does not actually *define* a player as having > a name, merely tells us that it's against the rules not to. (Or > rather, it tells us we must, which Rule 14 tells us means it's against > the rules not to but does not mean it happens automatically.) > > (Also, what is up with every single mildly-scamlike game action I take > getting copied? Have you all had your creativity atrophy in my > absence?) > > - > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss