Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0-indexed days Considered Harmful

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No rule allows a rule to alter the game state.

- 0x44

On Mar 2, 2010, at 6:01 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > From: bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:37:27 -0600
> > To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0-indexed days Considered Harmful
> >
> > > Technically true but 9 proposals have been voted on under the  
> > > current system and it has worked due to rule 45. It probably  
> > > should be changed though. I withdraw my objection.
> >
> > Rule 10 seems to overrule Rule 45.
>
>
> No, rule 45 changes the gamestate. There's no conflict because rule  
> 45 doesn't deny that what rule 10 says is right, it just changes the  
> gamestate arbitrarily at a single point in time (14 days after the  
> statement was made), without reference to the rules. There is no  
> rule saying rules cannot change the gamestate.
> _________________________________________________________________
> We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories.  
> Tell us now
> http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss