Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0-indexed days Considered Harmful

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:37:27 -0600
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0-indexed days Considered Harmful
> 
> > 
> > Technically true but 9 proposals have been voted on under the current system and it has worked due to rule 45. It probably should be changed though. I withdraw my objection. 
> 
> Rule 10 seems to overrule Rule 45.


No, rule 45 changes the gamestate. There's no conflict because rule 45 doesn't deny that what rule 10 says is right, it just changes the gamestate arbitrarily at a single point in time (14 days after the statement was made), without reference to the rules. There is no rule saying rules cannot change the gamestate. 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss