| Geoffrey Spear on Tue, 2 Mar 2010 15:48:42 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0-indexed days Considered Harmful |
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:37 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mar 2, 2010, at 4:22 PM, James Baxter wrote: > >> >>> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:23:04 -0500 >>> From: wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: [s-b] 0-indexed days Considered Harmful >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:41 PM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> I object. If you want to change ntime so it isn't based on zero, submit a proposal. >>> >>> Voting periods end at the end of a day that can never happen, so >>> proposals can't pass. >>> >> >> >> Technically true but 9 proposals have been voted on under the current system and it has worked due to rule 45. It probably should be changed though. I withdraw my objection. > > Rule 10 seems to overrule Rule 45. Yes, having the ratification mechanism at Chutzpah 2 is probably a bad idea. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss