| Craig Daniel on Thu, 31 Dec 2009 09:46:11 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 24 Dec 2009. |
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:41 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No, Objnomic turned it off: > http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Clock_automatic&direction=prev&oldid=11874 > > Then you turned it on: > http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Clock_automatic&direction=next&oldid=11873 > > Both those events occurred on 24 December, the clock wasn't incremented in between. This fixes some things - at least maybe. I CFI on the following statement: "The purported distribution of a ballot on or about Rushnight of the current nweek constitutes recognition of all proposals mentioned." Arguments: since it clearly wasn't a valid ballot but did assign numbers to all the proposals, I think this is clearly TRUE. - teucer _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss