Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 24 Dec 2009.

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 31, 2009, at 10:46 AM, Craig Daniel wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:41 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> No, Objnomic turned it off:
>> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Clock_automatic&direction=prev&oldid=11874
>> 
>> Then you turned it on:
>> http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Clock_automatic&direction=next&oldid=11873
>> 
>> Both those events occurred on 24 December, the clock wasn't incremented in between.
> 
> This fixes some things - at least maybe. I CFI on the following
> statement: "The purported distribution of a ballot on or about
> Rushnight of the current nweek constitutes recognition of all
> proposals mentioned."
> 
> Arguments: since it clearly wasn't a valid ballot but did assign
> numbers to all the proposals, I think this is clearly TRUE.
> 
> - teucer

Additionally, if this is clearly TRUE (and I think it is), then we are still on David nweek 160 and I am obliged to distribute a ballot.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss