Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 24 Dec 2009.

[James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

NttPF

> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:46:05 -0500
> From: teucer@xxxxxxxxx
> To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 161 - 24 Dec 2009.
> 
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 11:41 AM, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > No, Objnomic turned it off:
> > http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Clock_automatic&direction=prev&oldid=11874
> >
> > Then you turned it on:
> > http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Clock_automatic&direction=next&oldid=11873
> >
> > Both those events occurred on 24 December, the clock wasn't incremented in between.
> 
> This fixes some things - at least maybe. I CFI on the following
> statement: "The purported distribution of a ballot on or about
> Rushnight of the current nweek constitutes recognition of all
> proposals mentioned."
> 
> Arguments: since it clearly wasn't a valid ballot but did assign
> numbers to all the proposals, I think this is clearly TRUE.
> 
>  - teucer

 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Got more than one Hotmail account? Save time by linking them together
 http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/186394591/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss