Alex Smith on Wed, 23 Dec 2009 03:43:54 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 102/0 |
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 21:03 -0500, Craig Daniel wrote: > Since there is no indication in the ruleset that the action causes the > old player to deregister, I assert that a requirement for becoming a > player (which is obviously and tautologically not a requirement for > being a player) is, by the definition of the word "become," not being > a player already. > > I judge CFI 102 TRUE. For quite a while, bigamy was impossible to commit in the UK for this reason. The issue is that marriage was defined as a change of state from being unmarried to being married, and so it was theoretically impossible to become married whilst already married. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss