0x44 on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:41:17 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Populating the Upper House


Oh man, my sincere apologies for the clusterfuck that is:
On Dec 21, 2009, at 5:21 PM, 0x44 wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 23:04:41 +0000, James Baxter <jebaxter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> 
>> I took the most recent request to become a player as replacing the
>> previous playerhood of codae, creampuff1 and creampuff2. 		 	   		  
> 
> This need clarification. I CFI on "The entity identified as 'Justin Ahmann'
> posting from the email address 'quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' is registered
> as
> a Player of B Nomic by the name 'Codae'."
> 
> Arguments: An entity may not register as a player more than once. The
> entity 
> was already a player when e purported to register with the name Creampuff1.
> 
> Subsequent to that attempted registration, e sent two additional messages
> purporting to register with the names Creampuff2 and Creampuff3. If the
> first
> attempt at registration deregistered em and reregistered em with the new
> name,
> e should be registered as Creampuff3. If eir first attempt to register as 
> Creampuff1 failed because e was already registered, e is still registered
> as
> Codae. The first line of reasoning does not seem to follow from the rules,
> and
> wishing to register is not synonymous with wishing to deregister and
> reregister.
> There already exists a mechanism by which a player may change eir name, so
> the
> entity identified as 'Justin Ahmann' should be registered as the player
> Codae.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss