Re: [s-d] [s-b] [registrar] Report for nweek 161

0x44 on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:46:40 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [registrar] Report for nweek 161

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [registrar] Report for nweek 161
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:46:36 -0600
In-reply-to: <SNT109-W54A5E2F7A22FFC4765BB6E85810@xxxxxxx>
References: <56F757A6-7406-450C-A92F-1AE65087796B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W54A5E2F7A22FFC4765BB6E85810@xxxxxxx>

On Dec 22, 2009, at 10:07 AM, James Baxter wrote:
> 
> I object to the above statement about the game state because I have 2 points as I answered the telephone this nweek and that is not shown in the report. 		 	   		  

Updated: http://b.nomic.net/index.php?title=Players&oldid=11870
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Gardener] The Garden
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [Oracle] CFI 102/0
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [registrar] Report for nweek 161
Next by thread: [s-d] The clock is off?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread