Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah

Craig Daniel on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:19:49 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:19:45 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7soLNsIEtbcD/ZFiOBsLxxIAGKmjPjyjfG/oGuzSpSo=; b=kPuv8okhOtQVYN4arNdBbBXNy8/rqtnpnqvQ3t3X81Bdzs+aYwEfVFxgYgEEBvtN9n JmZ/vouYyYzCSyIlIGJauhoKV3oaecHWc/cQl/xXMi3k35nmWZ/I7JH5R3OBIYIMnETD SeqO8YVoQo7bYUHeaty1wiYHaTwLFznKom8hU=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=k8QAHhcWc5/W0fd33EzANFPPBPUbiPUjsTpfNGw7RCESjDQocRV/sPPHYoeJYsxMJf Jg7W7PIxRoBdz9X47KgolrUI8q5czo/b9JGdARP3nyA+ovSFqU5cURFQVkBeXNzc7vRA fClszVzOq1lkV5x1nI7vXOPPPpfrKiNDlZoy8=
In-reply-to: <dc05cc2c0911091118p34e4f839n609ae5f54e278e32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <653283240911090754j2d770bbcw64cc15a806618188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0911091040p4848592ch7a29543d06951e03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911091044m4e75983dr3077ca8b28652801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20911091046x588a5e44q17c2723f53a05ed8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911091053t7878496saa878571c6415853@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20911091113t1ff5effn2df06bb99bb02aa8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dc05cc2c0911091118p34e4f839n609ae5f54e278e32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Charles Walker
<charles.w.walker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Mostly I'd just like something new and non-Agoran in the ruleset.
>

Proto: Oracularities stand unless somebody throws a Bomb Gnome at the judge.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Charles Walker
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
  - From: Charles Walker

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread