| Charles Walker on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:18:12 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] blah |
2009/11/9 Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> proto-proto: Bring back Consultations, with Oracularities that go into >>>> effect when they become Pondered. Keep something analogous to our >>> >>> Proto: Oracularities take effect only with Bn Consent. >> >> Pondering was like Bn consent, except that if no one bothers to make a >> declaration of consistency it passes. > > Yeah, but adding an old game mechanic back in when we now have one > that does the same thing seems silly, and not silly in a "you're all > fucking nuts" way. But we had objection/ support and consistency coexisting in the old B, although it would have probably have made sense to combine the two. Mostly I'd just like something new and non-Agoran in the ruleset. Whether that's consistency or a modified support/objection system in this case makes little difference. -- Charles Walker _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss