Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160

Craig Daniel on Fri, 6 Nov 2009 11:43:36 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 13:43:32 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KEjNVmIARYLwqJC6i65KGCEQgHEeZa/Z7MwFrOB6N5A=; b=LKjwPOlu7u8qK7nMS4zmIdpPA7GEuaIApnOMlXJ0ebwUwKPFgNgeSYHFYjkOv+VwZL +7WipEK6kdAYCbfvMMyjEElaUX6qhJcl07NI421TDLfaiYyjyLYytIDY8jNIJK/VDeo2 agaPnt1cX7niwo9yVt2XTul2MC8K5EnYyOsDQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Oq+fV2dFnaIv9Dshr2zC/J9zzeaLbiDQJQJf1gazmdun0AKRwksOIPi2wmOPAPaedO 4XLNmQoPp9Zt0w95v5JURQb3kOFVLEMd443ALLFfL0MdZso2PV5pr3LzLFBHLCm3J0n/ TrxvMlug+9jDEDRGjnQwyP3xjwX6Wm5TiqyBs=
In-reply-to: <653283240911060927u255d462bx5b3e747974ba2115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <347567.75819.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <606cf17af6a1aed99065c4d3403c2081@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911051030j65cad4e3o59b640cc18cd967a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT109-W44A5DBF09D1C40EF81863A85AF0@xxxxxxx> <653283240911060727k227cea80mfbe8dc4316b629f4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20911060841i752c1544pe40ab82784e6dc94@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911060911y6513b678p924402de7af8f9cd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20911060921h74a22d1dqed9016713dbd5e16@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240911060927u255d462bx5b3e747974ba2115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Now, that doesn't mean it works, but it seems clear to me that it
>> works iff a bare "ttPF" works - and I think for the good of the game
>> they should both be found efficacious.
>
> ttPF is given special status by R6 + R14, since the synonym is a part
> of game custom.  you might infer that if I re-post a message with
> "flyxglrop" above it I have the same intent, but the ambiguity renders
> it ineffective.

It is my contention that Marr's intent lacked such ambiguity.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Vote Power?
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] [change] Ballot for nweek 160 - 03 Nov 2009.
Next by thread: [s-d] Vote Power?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread